Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers
Document Details

image.20260320225043940890.pdf

Document Type
Motion
Document Title
PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS
Document Summary
This filing is Plaintiffs' reply in support of their motion for judgment on the pleadings regarding Defendants' counterclaims. Plaintiffs argue that Defendants have failed to substantively oppose their claims of immunity and other defenses, and that judgment on the pleadings is warranted. The reply also addresses the voluntary dismissal of certain counterclaims, the lack of a viable Fourth Amendment claim, and the absence of a legal basis for claims of frivolous conduct or for Hungry Hustler Records' counterclaims.
Filing Date
Sunday, July 7, 2024
Client Summary
The Plaintiffs have submitted a response to support their request for a court decision based only on the written documents, concerning the counterclaims made by the Defendants. They argue that the Defendants haven't properly challenged their immunity and other defenses, so they believe the court should rule in their favor. In this response, the Plaintiffs also talk about some counterclaims that the Defendants decided to drop, say that the Defendants don't have a strong case for violating the Fourth Amendment, and claim there’s no legal reason for the Defendants' accusations of silly or pointless behavior, or for any claims made by Hungry Hustler Records.